Over the past years, many writers have made gauzy attempts to come up to issues confronting Africa. The views expressed by these writers in their guards be influenced by the study happenings on the guileless within the period period the book is to be written. But one intimacy that leaves much to be desired or so the approaches taken by some of these authors is the generalizations they produce about the whole African continent, using the woes of just a few countries as a marker for the others. This paper seeks to par and contrast the approaches taken by Keith B. Richburg and Karl Maier in discussing Africa. Richburgs confrontation of Africa in his book, Out of America, discusses his traumatic experiences in Africa. His approach reveals to the reader that the current Africa is just a counterpart of the Dark Continent set fore by archaean explorers. Richburg describes Africa as a senseless continent (153), violent (227), and a strange and forbidding place (237) where combat and other wicked activities is the order of the day. He states that: Its one of those questionable stories you always look coming out of Africa, meant to demonstrate the atrocity of the natives. Babies being pulled gain their mothers backs and tossed onto spears. Pregnant women being disemboweled. Bodies being tossed into the river and sleek downstream.
You heard them all, alone never really believed (xiii). Richburg thus imposes on the reader the ferocious nature of Africans. He tries to justify this two-baser he puts forth to his readers by his unrealistic and over-exaggerated descriptions of his encounters and experiences at the workforce! of civilians, the military, and guerilla fighters. Richburg does non have any positive thoughts about Africa during his travels from the time he smells (1) the continent till his departure. In Richburgs eyes, Africa... If you motivation to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment